Differences Between Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy

Many people are curious about the relationship between Occupational Therapy (OT) and Physical Therapy / Physiotherapy (PT). There is often confusion about these two professions and some even think that the two are synonymous. There are significant differences between the two professions, and here are also many grey areas where the two overlap. Read below for a more detailed explanation of how the are similar and how they are different.

Occupational Therapy

As compared with Physical Therapy, occupational therapy tends to focus more on evaluating and improving a persons functional abilities. An occupational therapist often does not directly treat a person’s injury using techniques such as manual therapy or acupuncture like a physical therapist would but more commonly helps a person optimize their independence and their ability to accomplish their daily activities following an injury or in situations of physical impairment.

Occupational therapists often will directly treat injuries, but more even often occupational therapy focuses more on improving life skills and incorporating adaptive tools at times customized by the therapist. In some parts of the world occupational therapists utilize practices such as use of ultrasound in injury rehabilitation, much like a physical therapist does.

Helping people improve their ability to carry out their daily tasks is a prime goal of the occupational therapist. An OT is more likely to perform on-site assessments of both the home environment and work environment and give recommendations on suitable adaptations of each to allow for a better quality of life. The occupational therapist is trained to modifying the physical environment as well as training the person to use assistive equipment to increase independence. While physical therapists do on-site assessments as well this tends to be less common.

Physical Therapy / Physiotherapy

The physical therapy profession (also called ‘physiotherapy’ in many parts of the world)  tends to be more focused on evaluating and diagnosing movement dysfunctions as well as treating a person’s injury itself. While an occupational therapist will often also do diagnosis, the physical therapist will be more likely to diagnose and treat the physical source of the problem; the injured tissues and structures.

Both physical and occupational therapists are trained extensively in anatomy and the musculoskeletal system resulting in both being very knowledgeable about musculoskeletal injuries and rehabilitation than a general practitioner medical doctor.

Overlap Between OT and PT

Although the two health care professions have differences in their focus there is much crossover between OT and PT. For an example of the crossover, an occupational therapist is often involved in educating people on how to prevent and avoid injuries, as well as educating people about the healing process, just like a physical therapist. Physical therapists in turn often help people improve their ability to do their daily activities through education and training. While there is this crossover between professions both play very important roles and are specialized in their areas of expertise. In many situations, both types of health-care professional are involved in injury recovery.

Video discussing the difference between Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy:


12 thoughts on “Differences Between Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy

  1. Pingback: carmenlucille96
    1. Occupational Therapy. Many occupational therapists specialize in hand therapy.Hope that helps & best of luck to you!

    2. pt because strokes cut oxygen to parts of your body and then you cant move and it becomes hard to to ADL activaties of daily living=== and if you can not recover from PT consider OT to modify your surrounding to make your ADL considerably easier 😀

  2. Interesting, I didn’t really know about occupational therapy or know there was a difference between the two. My mom might need an occupational therapist, because she’s getting her hip replaced. Would that be the best option for her?

    1. there is no “best” she will recieve both services while in the hospital. the OT in this case will teach her how to maintain total hip precautions and still perform self care and other tasks as maintaining total hip precautions is critical to safety. The PT will actually rehab the hip making it stronger again. Both services may work on transfers.

  3. Wow this was not at all a good article. A PT is trained and educated and licensed to practice everything a OT can do. But a OT is not educated and trained and licensed to do everything a PT can do. This is not mean to put down OT but it is true. There is a need for OTs but often they are seen as less important in many areas because insurance companies do not see the need to pay for the extra refinement to treatment. In a medical field where everyone is trying to find there piece of the pie you see encroachment of one field into another. Mostly OT and Chiro encroaching into PT as they are becoming the most used and most excepted with the most evidence to back up their treament techniques. As insurance companies look for more and more ways to cut cost i wouldnt be suprised to see OT and chiro loss more and more of their usefulness in the health care market. Sorry if that offends anyone but it is just how it is.

    1. Actually that’s false. Let me know next time a PT develops splints and creatively integrates activities with adaptive equipment that mimics ADLs. OT’s perform ROM, MMT, facilitate strength exercises, mobilization of joints and extremities, and adapt said therapies to a person’s work, home, and recreational endeavors. Definitely more
      Brain-power on the part of an OT. You also see OT’s heavily in the school system, NOT pt’s. The pale scale is very similar so clearly pt’s don’t have an edge.

Leave a Reply